In many territories, mobilities are not isolated: pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles follow one another, intersect or use the same access. Sometimes in a shared space, sometimes in parallel circulations. The visual brings together the most common situations where several types of uses coexist — and where it becomes essential to know who is circulating, when and in what proportions.
In many sites, the uses are never homogeneous. Pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles sometimes travel in the same place, sometimes at different times, sometimes on parallel but interdependent paths. Without measurement, it is difficult to understand how these mobilities really combine: who uses the space, when, and in what proportions.

Each site blends uses in its own way. Some want to know only pedestrians in an area where bicycles also pass; others want to isolate bicycles from a path shared with vehicles; still others want to compare “soft mobility” and “motorized” without going into the details of each mode.
Our approach consists in distinguishing the different types of passages, then recomposing the indicators according to your objective:
The challenge is not to count everything everywhere, but to produce data that corresponds exactly to the question you are asking yourself:
Who's going around? When? In what proportion? In what dynamic over the seasons, hours or events?
This flexibility makes it possible to adapt the analysis to spaces that are sometimes shared, sometimes simply frequented by several modes at different times, without complicating your reading.
Customer cases
In many sites, the uses are never homogeneous. Pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles sometimes travel in the same place, sometimes at different times, sometimes on parallel but interdependent paths. Without measurement, it is difficult to understand how these mobilities really combine: who uses the space, when, and in what proportions.

Cohabitation can seem fluid or conflicting at different times: measuring each use separately shows where and when interactions become sensitive.
To choose what to secure, where to appease or which mode to choose, you need to know the real part of each flow. Impressions are not enough to arbitrate.
Some modes dominate in the morning, others at the end of the day, others at the weekend or during the tourist season. Separating uses makes it possible to identify these rhythms.
The distinction between modes sheds light on applications from elected officials, technical services or funders: soft, motorized, mixed mobility... each category has its own impact.
Bicycle path, greenway, peaceful area: distinguishing who is really using the space makes it possible to assess whether the development is achieving its objective or if an adjustment is necessary.
In many places, cohabitation seems homogeneous, although it varies greatly depending on the time of day or mode. The measure reveals these nuances and avoids hasty conclusions.
Motorised contexts do not always require heavy systems. Verdilo provides a simple, autonomous approach to measure vehicle passages in controlled accesses, car parks, narrow streets and shared routes. Its technical characteristics are designed to deliver reliable, actionable data that is quick to deploy — with no civil works and no power supply.
Works without power supply (Autonomy estimated at more than 2 olds).
Set up in 2 minutes, with no expertise required, delivered ready to use.
Designed for outdoor conditions, in natural or urban environments.
No images saved, RGPD compliance.
Clear reading of the directions of passage and differentiation between pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles.
Online consultation or local survey in remote areas.

Discover our complete guide to choose the right solution for your public spaces.
Each site is different — we help you choose the easiest and most reliable configuration.